CoVaccine HT™ is an oil-in-water vaccine adjuvant consisting of synthetic sucrose fatty acid sulphate esters (SFASE) immobilised on the oil droplets of a submicron emulsion of squalane in water. In keeping with other lipopolysaccharide (LPS) mimetic containing adjuvants, CoVaccine HT™ has been shown to elicit its effect through toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) signalling.3 It has also been evaluated with many vaccine antigens in nonclinical and clinical assessments.1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8 It has shown superior antibody responses relative to a number of other adjuvants whilst still generating antigen specific cellular immune responses.2,4,5,6 CoVaccine HT™ has been administered to humans as part of a healthy volunteer dose finding study for the vaccine adjuvant alone, and also in patient settings for the development of two therapeutic vaccines (Angiotensin Therapeutic Vaccine (ATV) and PEP223 in Prostate Cancer). The vaccine adjuvant has broad patent protection, and a robust fully synthetic manufacturing process to cGMP, that is amenable to further scale up and is transferable. CoVaccine HT™ development is continuing through in-house programmes, external collaborations, and independent research via key institutions. We are actively engaging with companies who are looking to enhance their vaccine portfolios by partnering a novel vaccine adjuvant that provides both a superior qualitative and quantitative immune response. References: - Blom A, Hilgers L (2004). Sucrose fatty acid sulphate esters as novel vaccine adjuvants: effect of the chemical composition. Vaccine 23 (2004) 743–754
- Rosul A, Hargrave I, Glover J, Auton T, Waterman S, Dowhnam M (IMV 2005) Immunopotentiators in Modern Vaccines
- Bodewes R, Geelhoed-Mieras M, Heldens J, Glover J, Lambrecht B, Fouchier R, Osterhaus A, Rimmelzwaan G (2009). The novel adjuvant CoVaccine HT™ increases the immunogenicity of cell-culture derived influenza A/H5N1 vaccine and induces the maturation of murine and human dendritic cells in vitro. Vaccine 27 (2009) 6833-6839
- Bodewes R, Kreijtz J, van Amerongen G, Geelhoed-Mieras M, Verburgh R, Heldens J, Bedwell J, van den Brand J, Kuiken T, van Baalen C, Fouchier R, Osterhaus A, Rimmelzwaan G (2010). A single immunization with CoVaccine HT™-adjuvanted H5N1 influenza vaccine induces protective cellular and humoral immune responses in ferrets. J. Virol. (2010) 7943–7952
- Kusi KA, Faber BW, Riasat V, Thomas AW, Kocken CHM, et al. (2010) Generation of Humoral Immune Responses to Multi-Allele PfAMA1 Vaccines; Effect of Adjuvant and Number of Component Alleles on the Breadth of Response. PLoS ONE (2010)
- Draper S, Biswas S, Spencer A, Remarque E, Capone S, Naddeo M, Dicks M, Faber B, de Cassan S, Folgori A, Nicosia A, Gilbert S, Hill A (2010). Enhancing Blood-Stage Malaria Subunit Vaccine Immunogenicity in Rhesus Macaques by Combining Adenovirus, Poxvirus, and Protein-in-Adjuvant Vaccines. J. Immunology (2010)
- Heldens J.G.M, Glansbeek H.L, Hilgers L.A.T, Haenen B, Stittelaar K.J, Osterhaus A.D.M.E, van den Bosch J.F. Feasibility of single-shot H5Nl influenza vaccine in ferrets, macaques and rabbits (2010). Vaccine 28 (2010) 8125-8131
- Mahdi Abdel Hamid M, Remarque EJ, van Duivenvoorde LM, van der Werff N, Walraven V, et al. (2011) Vaccination with Plasmodium knowlesi AMA1 Formulated in the Novel Adjuvant Co-Vaccine HTTM Protects against Blood-Stage Challenge in Rhesus Macaques. PLoS ONE 6(5): e20547. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0020547
|
We’re developing Varisolve® (polidocanol endovenous microfoam (PEM)) as (1) a first line treatment for incompetent great saphenous veins (GSV) and associated varicosities, above and below the knee and (2) for use alongside endovenous thermal ablation.
In the US alone over 40 million patients suffer from varicose veins.1 Most sufferers opt not to have their veins treated, as current treatments require either the surgical removal of the vein or insertion of a catheter. As potentially the first approved drug, PEM could transform this underserved market by making varicose vein treatment more acceptable.
PEM has a controlled density, consistent bubble sizes, and proprietary gas mix that makes it a simple and comprehensive treatment for symptomatic and aesthetic varicose veins. A European Phase III clinical trial showed that 90% of patients treated with PEM had no reflux in the GSV at 3 months and fewer than 10% of patients had recurrence at 1 year. Patients can generally return to work or their usual activities the same day they are treated, and cosmetic results after PEM treatment are apparent at 6 weeks.1
Recruitment was completed several months ahead of schedule in August 2011 into three Phase III trials of PEM, an experimental treatment for great saphenous vein (GSV) incompetence. VANISH-1 and VANISH-2 have relief of symptoms as the primary endpoint and improvement in appearance as the secondary endpoint. Study VV017 is designed to support approval for PEM to be used alongside heat ablation of the GSV to treat those vein segments not dealt with by the ablation procedure.
In January 2012 we announced the successful outcome of VANISH-2, the first of two US pivotal Phase III studies comparing the safety and efficacy of PEM with placebo in patients with symptomatic and visible varicose veins and saphenofemoral junction incompetence. The study met all primary, secondary and tertiary endpoints.
Data from the remaining two Phase III studies (VANISH-1 and VV017) are also expected to be available in H1 2012, leading to the submission of a New Drug Application in the US by the end of 2012. We plan to market and sell PEM directly in the US reimbursed sector following approval.
We’re exploring options for partnering in the US aesthetic and rest-of-world markets.
References: - Wright et al, Phlebology 2006. Vol .21 No. 4
|